Permit Issued for 438 W St. James Place in Lincoln Park

Site rendering of 438 W Saint James Place by Hirsch MPG

A full construction permit has been issued for a new residential building at 438 W St. James Place in Lincoln Park, replacing a two-story stone masonry residence. This development by St. James Interest LLC will stand five stories and house four apartment units.

Site rendering of 438 W Saint James Place by Hirsch MPG

Rendering of 438 W Saint James Place by Hirsch MPG

The permit has listed Hirsch MPG as the architect of record. Renderings for this 67-foot-tall structure show a dark brick facade, loft-styled windows, inset balconies, extensive gardening, and landscaping.

previous (left) – current (right) rendering of 438 W Saint James Place by Hirsch MPG

A ground-level garage will house five parking spaces. For transit, CTA bus service for Routes 22 and 36 are within a five-minute walk, while the Red, Brown, and Purple Lines are all available at Fullerton station via a 15-minute walk southwest.

G Corp will serve as the general contractor for the $5.5 million construction. Completion is anticipated for 2025.

Subscribe to YIMBY’s daily e-mail

Follow YIMBYgram for real-time photo updates
Like YIMBY on Facebook
Follow YIMBY’s Twitter for the latest in YIMBYnews

.

5 Comments on "Permit Issued for 438 W St. James Place in Lincoln Park"

  1. wow I am surprised the city & the alderman didn’t approve a 8-10 story POS.
    good thing this fits in.

    • Implying the 10 story building wouldn’t have also fit in just as well. There’s a 12 story building right next to it, if anything the current version is too small for the context.

  2. skill-less design. Of all the possibilities of designing a residential building in a prime location, this is the dumbest, oh no, second dumbest design….the dumbest design was the first entry.

    • The first design would have been considered historically significant architecture by 2080. The second design is blander, but that’s what the neighbors demanded.

      • I believe the developer was the one that also lowered the height as construction costs were significantly lower. With the taller building they needed a crane in a very tight area.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.


*