TIF Funds Initially Approved For Foundry Park Infrastructure Work

Rendering of Foundry Park by HPA and Nudge Design

Additional renderings have been revealed as the Chicago Community Development Commission approves TIF funds for the upcoming Foundry Park megadevelopment. Sitting on the western edge of Lincoln Park, the project has already received approval from City Council and is set to replace the northern half of the former Lincoln Yards site.

Rendering of Foundry Park by HPA and Nudge Design

One of the largest missing pieces for the project was the reallocation of over $400 million in Tax Increment Financing (TIF) previously approved for Lincoln Yards. Now, Foundry Park developers JDL and Kayne Anderson have moved forward with their request for $201.5 million in TIF funding to support $234 million worth of infrastructure and parkland work across the entire property.

Rendering of Foundry Park by HPA and Nudge Design

Rendering of Foundry Park by HPA and Nudge Design

With the developers contributing $33 million toward the effort, the total funds will be roughly split between $7 million for site preparation, $70 million for roads, $121 million for parks, $13 million for riverfront work, and $21.5 million for an extension of The 606, including a new bridge. It is worth noting that not all of these elements will be built during the initial phase.

Site programing of Foundry Park by HPA and Nudge Design

The overall $3 billion project will deliver over six million square feet of space, making it relatively smaller than Lincoln Yards. This will include 3,207 residential units ranging from apartments to single-family homes, 350,000 square feet of office and medical space, hotel rooms, and 420,000 square feet of retail space spread across five phases.

Rendering of Foundry Park by HPA and Nudge Design

The first phase will cover a triangle-shaped lot bounded by an extension of North Southport Avenue and West Cortland Street. It will cost around $800 million to build and will sit atop a new site-wide underground parking garage with 777 spaces. Above this will rise four main structures arranged around a central park with year-round programming.

Basement – ground – tower plans of phase one of Foundry Park by HPA and Nudge Design

These structures will range from eight to 38 stories in height, including Foundry Park’s tallest building, which will top out at 520 feet. The phase will include a hotel tower with 183 rooms, retail and commercial space across the ground floors of all buildings, office space, and 709 residential units made up of apartments and condos. Of those, 95 will be provided as on-site affordable housing.

Rendering of Foundry Park by HPA and Nudge Design

Rendering of Foundry Park by HPA and Nudge Design

The team will also pay around $7 million into the city’s affordable housing fund to make up for the remaining required units. With the construction timeline looming, the developers will begin seeking construction financing next month and are expected to select a contractor soon after, according to Crain’s. No timeline is currently known for the remaining phases.

The TIF funds will now need to clear City Council prior to being fully approved. A more in-depth breakdown of the overall project can be found here.

Subscribe to YIMBY’s daily e-mail

Make YIMBY preferred on Google

Follow YIMBYgram for real-time photo updates
Like YIMBY on Facebook
Follow YIMBY’s Twitter for the latest in YIMBYnews

.

28 Comments on "TIF Funds Initially Approved For Foundry Park Infrastructure Work"

  1. J. Paul Jones | June 10, 2026 at 8:48 am | Reply

    This is most significant. It’s our collective hope that the developer and the city Corporation Counsel include in its Redevelopment Agreement – linked development options for the Englewood District which received Lincoln Yards Garbage Transfer Station. In September, we will enter the third year of the City’s Cumulative Impact ordinance which was triggered by the prior land use planners for the Lincoln Yard. Nevertheless, the designs are beautiful and expansion of the 606 brings hope for the designs and full funding for the scheduled Englewood Nature Trail.

  2. Alas- no proper roadway planning ! Cortland and the mess with Clybourn and Ashland is woefully inadequate for not just current needs, but the immense density permitted !

  3. As I read of all the hotel rooms, amenities in this project and with the new Casino/hotel/residential construction, I can’t help but wonder if this will speed up the decline of the Loop. Maybe the Loop gets what it deserves, but if traffic (yes, people walking, cars, even bikes) in the Loop declines faster and further than expected, some of the new office to residential transitions may have a hard time making it. Ditto the older (but still attractive) hotels. I don’t see a real value in shifting the City center farther north.

    • I think this shifting away from the originally planned commercial usage of Lincoln Yards, to predominantly residential, lessens that risk. I would hope that, overall, this helps make Chicago a more attractive place to live, work, hire, and start a business.

    • how exactly is the Loop declining? maybe in terms of office space but it is growing as an actual neighborhood where people live. gained thousands of new residents in the last year or two

      • james the third | June 10, 2026 at 1:48 pm | Reply

        exactly. if you want to see decline, look at the “downtowns” of other American cities where people commute to the office on the weekdays and then leave the place deserted at all other times. at least Chicago has an understanding that they need to shift this functionality, and we’re already seeing some improvements.

    • Le Courvoisier | June 10, 2026 at 4:26 pm | Reply

      LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL
      Decline of the Loop. Funniest thing I’ve heard all day.

  4. Instead of another 5 years of planning and negotiations, it’s great to see this huge project finally getting underway, more than 10 years after Finkl Steel was demolished and less than a year after JDL bought the site. Kudos to them for a buildable plan, with a mix of scales, designs and amenities that could make this a fantastic addition to Chicago.

  5. The 606 extension will be so good for the city we’ll wonder how we ever lived without it.

  6. This looks amazing! I’m glad they are being attentive towards the public realm as well and prioritizing open space. I really hope they activate the riverbank fully; such an underutilized natural asset to the city that is basically not used outside of downtown or a few parks.

  7. i don’t see anything in this article that says what infrastructure this money will be used for or when that’s happening.

    • Third paragraph states: “the total funds will be roughly split between $7 million for site preparation, $70 million for roads, $121 million for parks, $13 million for riverfront work, and $21.5 million for an extension of The 606, including a new bridge. It is worth noting that not all of these elements will be built during the initial phase.”

  8. Is there ways to improve public transit here and adjacent areas?

  9. Don’t expect to ever see the extention of the 606. Too costly to get over Kennedy. Heard that it will be routed it to Cortland. Not sure how that can work under the expressway across Ashland and over a bridge that isn’t being widened based on plans I’ve seen.
    Shold have replaced the bridge with a functional bridge. Probably could have been done in half the time and similar cost

    • Zoning realist | June 10, 2026 at 5:16 pm | Reply

      They will “extend” it in a disjointed fashion. But even being able to get from Elston to Kingsbury/Marcey off street would be a boon. And if General Iron’s Landing Park gets built, and some connection to Cherry Street bridge is made…and two led/bike bridges off Goose Island (preferably both at Blackhawk) are added…that’s pretty great even with a hairy break between Ashland and Elston.

  10. I was hoping they would of kept the southport/throop street bridge going north south across the river intact but maybe in a future design they will install it as a bike/ped bridge if Lincoln Yards south is reimagined into something better.

  11. How much is the Loop “expected” to ‘decline?’ Talk about zero-sum thinking. What an odd way to understand a city.

  12. Just begging for the 606 to connect across the river. Car traffic is horrendous on every north side east west bridge. Biking is dangerous and unpleasant. walking is miserable experience. just one car free way to get east west would be a god send. dont think a new el line is happening in this lifetime so just please make this.

    i know the city delayed the Ashland to Elston segment a year due to the MC Escher path around the highway and train tracks but hoping for some movement on that in the next year or two.

  13. With the timeline of North Union lagging how it has this will probably take until 2050 to complete. I haven’t seen the blankwalls until now. Hopefully the street facing sides are active with liner units or this project will feel sterile. They said they were building underground parking but I guess that was a bait n switch. This city deserves better than wind screens on the ground level.

  14. This site has like zero transit access. The Loop has a huge advantage over this.

    It will not kill the Loop

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.


*