Streeterville Hotel To Undergo Residential Conversion

View of 201 E Walton Pl via LoopNet

Plans have been revealed for the residential conversion of the existing hotel building at 201 East Walton Place in Streeterville. Sitting on the corner with North Mies Van Der Rohe Way, the property currently operates as Sonesta Extended Stay Suites and would close ahead of the conversion. Efforts for this are being led by Churchwick Partners.

Rendering of 201 E Walton Pl by bKL Architecture

Late last year, the New York–based developer purchased the property for around $3 million, having secured a $68 million loan soon after for the upcoming work. Since then, they have brought on local design firm bKL Architecture to work on the updated interiors and layouts. The 18-story structure dates back to the 1950s and has long served as a hotel.

Rendering of 201 E Walton Pl by bKL Architecture

Rendering of 201 E Walton Pl by bKL Architecture

Plans call for a phased approach to convert the existing 221 hotel rooms into 221 apartments. These would be made up of 110 studios, 80 one-bedroom, and 31 two-bedroom layouts; the conversion would be facilitated due to the nature of extended-stay hotels having larger multi-room accommodations already built.

Ground floor plan of 201 E Walton Pl by bKL Architecture

Renderings of 201 E Walton Pl by bKL Architecture

Residents would have access to a 72-vehicle parking garage that is to remain, along with a lounge, fitness room, coworking space, dog run, and small outdoor terraces. The team will now need to receive zoning approval, which they plan to do by the fall, with the hotel closing in December. Construction would take up to eight months for a mid-2027 opening.

Subscribe to YIMBY’s daily e-mail

Make YIMBY preferred on Google

Follow YIMBYgram for real-time photo updates
Like YIMBY on Facebook
Follow YIMBY’s Twitter for the latest in YIMBYnews

.

16 Comments on "Streeterville Hotel To Undergo Residential Conversion"

  1. I’m sorry, they paid how much??? Is the $68mm loan for construction or associated with additional expenses over the purchase price (assuming the original loan?)
    I’m not familiar with this stuff.

    • $68M implies a conversion cost of a little over $300K per unit. They paid $3M for the property, so add in financing costs etc and maybe their expenses end up around $400K per unit. The market values of those apartments in that location will average a damnsite more than that.

      • I was shocked by the $3 million sticker price. There’s standard lots in Lincoln Park selling for almost that much!

  2. I really love this building. Peak MCM.

  3. Great news! Love to see so many residential coversions in the downtown area.

  4. Love to see it

  5. The fact that this property was fetched for $3M just blows my mind away.

    Whoever owned this property before just got properly FLEECED, I tell ya. That is mind-blowing

  6. Great stuff!

  7. So a buyer from NY paid $3M for this ENTIRE BUILDING, yet the city thinks my single-family home is worth $1.5M, and it is only 3000 sq ft with no yard! Please tell me this sales price is a typo. Who is the appraiser and and how is this posible?

    • I checked and if it’s an error, it’s also coming from CoStar. No idea what’s going on here.

    • It’s irrelevant what the buyer paid for it – that has zip to do with taxes. It’s the assessors office that designates value.

      Their tax bill for 2025 came to $964,722.65. The 1st half tax for bill for 2026 is already higher than 2025 at $530,597.46

    • Maybe you can use this sale as a comp on a square foot cost for your house when you appeal your taxes

  8. Bobby Siemiaszko | April 30, 2026 at 1:40 pm | Reply

    Good to see. Now let’s fill in an empty lot somewhere downtown with a brand new hotel!

  9. I lived in this building when it was residential in 1980. A one bedroom was $525/month.There was an absolutely ancient doorman named Jimmy.

  10. Richard M Daley | April 30, 2026 at 6:13 pm | Reply

    Imagine the property taxes on that building that’s why the rich always want tax breaks

  11. Great insights on the conversion costs, Paul. It really puts that $3M purchase price into perspective—Churchwick Partners definitely secured a deal that seems almost too good to be true for Streeterville. Since the developer is New York-based and bringing in a lot of outside capital, do you think they’ll market this strictly as luxury rentals, or is there a chance for more competitive “attainable” pricing given the lower entry cost? Also, on a completely different note regarding the technical side of these digital platforms, has anyone here looked into the security protocols or the legitimacy of international service providers like Guiade1winColumbia.com for local transactions, or is it better to stick with domestic firms for financial transparency?

Leave a Reply to JimA Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published.


*