Four Single Family Homes Permitted As Logan Square Church And School Come Down

2028 North Richmond Street church demolitionThe school at 2018 (left) is rubble; in the background, the church meets the same fate.

Permits have now been secured for all four single-family residences to be built on the site of the vacant church and school on North Richmond Street in Logan Square. Both of those structures are now being demolished ahead of the lot’s redevelopment.

2903 West McLean Avenue arrived first, on November 13. The following week, 2909 West McLean received its new-build permission on the 19th, with 2905 and 2907 coming one day later. The permits are all identical, calling for two stories plus a basement and detached two-car garages. The garages will have rooftop decks, while the homes have decks at the rear. Ornamental iron fencing will separate each residence from the street, and wood fencing will surround the rear of the lots. Each permit comes with a reported cost of $903,000. Mar Van Development LLC is named as the developer, with plans created by 360 Design Studio and general contractor duties assigned to V & M Development, Inc.

North Richmond Street church demolition

Photo by Daniel Schell

North Richmond Street church demolition

Surely someone will claim the bell. Photo by Daniel Schell

North Richmond Street church demolition

Photo by Daniel Schell

North Richmond Street church demolition

An excavator reaches outside from inside the church. Photo by Daniel Schell

North Richmond Street church demolition

This was the school building. Photo by Daniel Schell

North Richmond Street church demolition

Photo by Daniel Schell

North Richmond Street church demolition

Photo by Daniel Schell

North Richmond Street church demolition

Photo by Daniel Schell

As of Thanksgiving Week, the school building has been knocked flat, though some perimeter walls are still standing. Mostly though, it’s a giant pile of rubble. Most of the church building’s roof is gone, with the structure accessed from the back portion of the south façade. There is an excavator inside the church on the second floor, working its way toward the front. The demolition crew used rubble as a platform to get the machine one story off the ground.

North Richmond Street church demolition

Photo by Daniel Schell

North Richmond Street church demolition

That pile of rubble allowed contractors to access the upper level of the church building. Photo by Daniel Schell

North Richmond Street church demolition

Photo by Daniel Schell

North Richmond Street church demolition

Photo by Daniel Schell

North Richmond Street church demolition

Photo by Daniel Schell

North Richmond Street church demolition

Photo by Daniel Schell

North Richmond Street church demolition

Photo by Daniel Schell

North Richmond Street church demolition

What remains of the front of the school. Photo by Daniel Schell

North Richmond Street church demolition

Photo by Daniel Schell

North Richmond Street church demolition

Photo by Daniel Schell

North Richmond Street church demolition

Photo by Daniel Schell

North Richmond Street church demolition

The rear of the school building from the alley. Photo by Daniel Schell

North Richmond Street church demolition

Looking through the school east to Richmond Street. Photo by Daniel Schell

Subscribe to YIMBY’s daily e-mail

Follow YIMBYgram for real-time photo updates
Like YIMBY on Facebook
Follow YIMBY’s Twitter for the latest in YIMBYnews

.

10 Comments on "Four Single Family Homes Permitted As Logan Square Church And School Come Down"

  1. Beautiful old historic church replaced by 4 single family homes. Why? $900,000 each to build single family homes – for that amount of money seems like they could have build some pretty not condos inside that church facade

  2. Anthony Sartoris | November 28, 2025 at 8:55 am | Reply

    With the lack of affordable housing in our area, a mid rise multi unit condo/apartment building would have accommodated way more than 4 houses for only 4 families. The city planning department needs to start looking at increasing affordable units in the neighborhoods, rather than allowing more of the same which exacerbates the problem.

    • While I agree that this should have been a much larger building project, likely resulting in lower priced dwelling units, government authorities force private developers into providing low income housing they have neither the desire to build or manage. Corrupt aldermen have down-zoned these areas to RS-3 to force developers to crawl to them for zoning relief. Then the aldermen either require donations (payouts) to their campaign funds or demand low income housing to be built on the site at the developers expense. This leaves developers with no choice but to build as of right of zoning. A better conclusion to this project would have been to compel the developer to save a portion of the church structure and in exchange for incorporating it into a larger project. I blame zoning and corruption for this result. And regarding affordable dwelling units in the city Chicago, right now, listed, are almost a thousand dwelling units under 100K.

      • Anthony Sartoris | November 28, 2025 at 10:29 am | Reply

        Been there, Thanks for the comment. To clarify I wasn’t speaking of low income housing, rather affordable housing for young working people maybe in their late twenties or early thirties. Decent starter units to build an investment and progress up from there if desired. I don’t have the real estate knowledge that you seem to have and if there are 1000 units for sale under 100k I’m not sure what kind of a housing shortage we have unless those homes are not desirable for some reason. All I hear is they the demand for limited density housing is outpacing supply causing homes to be out of reach for many. I don’t disagree with your comment, I just wanted to clarify mine a bit.

        • Anthony Sartoris | November 28, 2025 at 10:32 am | Reply

          Correction to above:
          All I hear is that the demand for limited desirable housing is outpacing supply causing homes to be out of reach for many.

  3. “Surely someone will claim the bell.” And those beams!

  4. This is just a travesty. One of the reasons people want to live in the city is to be amongst beautiful historic buildings. We don’t need any more ugly new development homes that already look like garbage after two to three years into their lifespan and seem to be built to discard within a decade.

  5. Some of those windows could be saved

  6. I’m cognizant of changing social patterns, and the fact that society is turning more secular. That said, whenever I see a church come down, whatever the replacement, I cannot help but think of the countless milestones that happened under its roof. The weddings and funerals and blessings, the communions and confirmations. All of the whispered prayers for health and happiness. It’s sad to lose that history.

  7. Single-family homes? Not even two-flats?

    That church was cool-looking but I would’ve supported it being replaced for something denser.

    4 houses for 4 wealthy families who probably won’t even live there during the winter. Not a good look.

Leave a Reply to JimA Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published.


*