Gary Indiana Formally Pitches Land For Chicago Bears Relocation

Potential Site A rendering via City of Gary

The city of Gary has released its official bid to become the new home of the Chicago Bears. Revealed earlier this week, the city, along with state legislators, have brought forth plans for the team to relocate just over the border as Illinois softens its stance on paying for the team’s infrastructure should they stay in the state.

Overall sites map via City of Gary

Gary and Indiana are prepared to provide the team with the tax incentives and funding that Illinois has refused. They have also introduced SB27 to create the Northwest Indiana Stadium Authority in order to purchase land, finance improvements, and manage leases for the team. Meanwhile, Arlington Heights has pleaded with Governor Pritzker to move forward with infrastructure funding.

Potential Site A rendering via City of Gary

The proposal also comes as the team continues a successful season, giving it more leverage with officials, even though the Bears remain one of the richest teams in the league. The team will play its next championship game this Sunday outdoors in 10-degree weather. As part of efforts to lure the team, Gary has created a new website, which can be found here.

Potential Site A rendering via City of Gary

According to the site, Gary is proposing three different parcels of varying sizes across the city. The city claims the sites are within a one-hour drive of 7.1 million people, a half-hour drive from the Chicago Loop, see 250,000 vehicles passing through daily on Interstate 80/94, offer access to an airport and rail connections, and could draw fans from three states, including Michigan.

The sites are as follows:

    Site A details via City of Gary

  • Gary West End – Located within the Black Oak area, the 400-acre site would replace a large forested area just off Interstate 94. The area is part of what the city is calling an entertainment district, with the Hard Rock Casino located across the street. This is also where the city plans to build a new convention center and hotel, which we covered here.
  • Site B details via City of Gary

  • Buffington Harbor – The smallest of the three options, this 145-acre site would replace a large retention pond and forested land sandwiched between Lake Michigan and Gary/Chicago International Airport. The city is promoting the site for its waterfront access, with views of some of the largest steel mills in the world located nearby.
  • Site C details via City of Gary

  • Miller Beach – The largest of the three sites at 760 acres, this waterfront property would combine land owned by U.S. Steel with Lake Street Beach and land that is part of Indiana Dunes National Park. It remains unclear what this would mean for the park. Like the Buffington Harbor site, this location would have access to opportunity zone funding and TIF money.

Potential Site A rendering via City of Gary

Potential Site A rendering via City of Gary

Talks are currently in the early stages, though the team has sent out surveys to gauge interest in an Indiana location and dispatched scouts to review the sites. Along with defining the three properties and releasing a sizzle reel, the city also shared a handful of renderings of what a potential stadium district could look like, seen above. At this time, no further information is available.

Would this make them the… Indiana Bears?

Subscribe to YIMBY’s daily e-mail

Follow YIMBYgram for real-time photo updates
Like YIMBY on Facebook
Follow YIMBY’s Twitter for the latest in YIMBYnews

.

19 Comments on "Gary Indiana Formally Pitches Land For Chicago Bears Relocation"

  1. Bunch of losers. Stop with this garbage.

  2. Site A would never work. Filling that development would be a fruitless effort. Site three presents a the best option imo.

    • Site 3 – if you think the Chicago Lakefront ordinance is strict, wait until they ask for a chunk of national park land. This is just as likely to happen as tearing down Buckingham Fountain to build a stadium.

  3. Let them have it, one can be a Bears fan and not a fan of their price tag (-: Call the Bears bluff, let them move.

  4. Most hilarious bluff I’ve seen – this would be exponentially more disastrous for the Bears than for Chicago/Illinois.

  5. For those not following closely, this post misses some key context — the Bears have already done preliminary site testing on a Hammond site and even brought the NFL Commissioner out for a visit last week. This is Gary trying to jump in the game. And the Bears are loving it.

    More importantly, this is all a ploy by the Bears to get Illinois to finance more of their Arlington Heights plan. There is ZERO chance the Bears will move to NW Indiana. But they have to look like they’re dead serious, get the media’s attention, and hope that fans and the public get upset enough to get politicians to take action. If they don’t look serious (drilling, renderings, legislation) it’s going to look pathetic and transparent.

    Remember that the Bears are historically tied to Lake Forest. Halas Hall ain’t moving, so Hammond/Gary is in the wrong spot. Their ideal home would be somewhere near downtown but there’s no appetite for the city to pay for this, and nobody at City Hall is clever enough to find a workaround (Rahm might have figured this one out, but BJ isn’t any kind of civic genius).

  6. Architecture and planning amateur hour. The same can be said for the concept proposals for both Arlington Heights and a new stadium immediately south of Soldier Field.

    Agree that the ideal location is near downtown, or a properly redesigned Soldier Field scheme. Don’t understand the assumption that if it’s downtown, the city has to solely pay for it. If the state is going to push to keep the Bears in Illinois, there would be incentive to financially support a Chicago site, or by turns, an inferior Arlington Heights location.

  7. Please go wherever you want to. For billionaires to ask any state to for financial assistance is absurd.
    To all public officials – to ask individuals to subsidize an extremely profitable team to stay with their tax dollars is a slap in your constituent’s face. Stay strong and stay the course.
    If the team was to go to Indiana – let them. Let’s see how many of their fans will follow.

    • The problem is that unlike other uber-rich team owners who bought teams after making a fortune, the McCaskeys aren’t close to billionaires. I mean I don’t feel sorry for them, but the Bears have been their sole family business for 100 years. The vast majority of their net worth is tied up in the team, and they’ve already been selling off chunks to raise liquid cash.

      So truly, they can’t afford to do something really great with a new stadium project. And ultimately that’s a loss for everyone involved as the city and state would benefit from a prestigious, state of the art venue near downtown.

      So because they’re not rich enough, and the city/state are mired in debt, nobody gets nice things. We’ll eventually get a cheap bottom-tier dome in Arlington Heights that won’t have the capacity the market deserves, will force the vast majority of attendees to drive and park for events, won’t do anything to boost the city itself, and will be outdated before it opens.

      The best answer is “sell the team”

  8. The fact that they’re considering commandeering National Park land for their opportunistic cash grab is insulting.

  9. Gary and especially Miller’s infrastructure is hilariously unprepared for such a scenario

  10. This is perhaps the most transparent bluff in the history of sports stadiums. If the team owners are stupid enough to think that forcing most fans to travel another 30-60 min to watch a game in Gary (of all places) is a good idea, they definitely deserve to take that chance. And if Indiana is stupid enough to help bankroll it, Indiana deserves to be saddled with the results. Illinois please call their bluff.

  11. Steve River North | January 18, 2026 at 8:07 am | Reply

    The die was cast when they bought Arlington Park and tore down the grandstand. Money has been sunk. If they stay downtown or move somewhere else, it will take decades to unload that piece of land, even doing it in small parcels. Even with the stadium built there in FIVE years it will take at least another decade to do all the “build out” they show in the fancy drawings.

  12. I think it would actually be better for everyone if the Bears moved to Indiana. That whole area needs economic development far more than the northwest suburbs. While I’m skeptical that one project can be too catalytic, this certainly has a lot more potential on the southeast side. And, if Indiana, rather than Illinois, pays for it, all the better for the Illinois taxpayer. Illinois would benefit a lot from any spillover effects in the south suburbs.

  13. It’s probably for the best of the bears move to nwi.

  14. Chicago should’ve moved on the old US Steel site just north of the border…

  15. Gary seems to have an excessive amount of previously developed or vacant land to chose from, so why does ever proposal take away forest, public parks and/or the lakefront???

  16. LOL, the Gary Bears – I love it. Right now, the only person in Chicago that can get a new stadium built is Pat Ryan. Soldier Field will be the Chicago Bears stadium until the McCaskey family sells the team. There is a billionaire out there who could make a deal for a state-of-the-art domed stadium that would wildly benefit the area.

    “Make no little plans; they have no magic to stir men’s blood and probably will not themselves be realized. Make big plans; aim high in hope and work. . .”

Leave a Reply to Gary Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published.


*